Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Informative Speech For Gun Ownership :: essays research papers

Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how touristy and respected, is the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. just the right of the citizen to bear arms is just one much safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has turn up to be always possible. -Hubert Humphrey, 1960 My background is probably atypical for a somewhat high-profile supporter of the right to keep and bear arms. I am black and grew up in Manhattans East Harlem, far removed from the great American gun culture of rural, white America. Although my voting patterns have plump somewhat more conservative in recent years, I remain in my heart of hearts a 1960s Humphrey Democrat concerned with the plight of those most open in American society-minorities, the poor, the elderly, and single wo men-groups whose day-to-day realities are often overlooked in our public policy debates, people whose lives too often go unperceived by our intellectually timid chattering classes. This is happening in the public debate over the right to bear arms. For the nations elites, the Second Amendment has become the Rodney Dangerfield of the Bill of Rights, constantly attacked by editorial writers, police chiefs seeking scapegoats, demagoging politicians, and most recently even by Rosie ODonnell, no less. It is threatened by timeserving legislative efforts, even when sponsors acknowledge their proposed legislation would have little impact on crime and violence. Professional champions of civil rights and civil liberties have been unwilling to take hold the underlying principle of the right to arms. Even the conservative defense has been timid and often inept, tied less, one suspects, to abiding principle and more to the dynamics of coeval Republican politics. Thus a right older than the R epublic, one that the drafters of two constitutional amendments the Second and the Fourteenth intended to protect, and a right whose critical grandness has been painfully revealed by twentieth-century history, is left undefended by the lawyers, writers, and scholars we routinely expect to defend other constitutional rights. Instead, the Second Amendments intellectual as hygienic as political defense has been left in the unlikely hands of the National Rifle Association (NRA). And although the NRA deserves considerably better than the demonized reputation it has acquired, it should not be the sole or even principal voice in defense of a major constitutional provision.

No comments:

Post a Comment