Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Article Response Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

member Response - Assignment ExampleThe breadth of Kuhns influence on intellectual fields is captured by Matthews (2003). According to Matthews (2003) more than a million readers were impacted by Kuhns works. Moreover, many more were influenced by educators and writers who discussed or otherwise debated or discussed Kuhns work. Matthews (2003) also points out that Kuhns impact on nurture goes further in sparking debate among scholars and impacting look and methodology techniques because Kuhn raised a number of philosophical and methodological questions relative to the acquisition of intimacy. This paper analyses Matthews (2003) article and draws on discernment from the education philosophies of Gutek (2000) and Eisner (2001) in ascertaining the practical implications for education. This research study is therefore divided into three main parts. The first part of this study provides a drumhead of Matthews position. The second part of the paper analyses Matthews position and its practical implications for education by reference to Gutek (2000 & 2004) and Eisners (2001) philosophies of education. The third part of the paper will provide the authors position and its practical implications for education. ... m theory relates to Kuhns conceptualization of normal science which is a research technique grounded by planetary concept, theory, test and methodology (p. 23). According to Matthews (2003), when Kuhn wrote The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, created an entirely variant conceptualization of science and in doing so impacted science education theory and research (p. 91). Matthews (2003) begins by offering some insight into Kuhn as a philosopher. Kuhn was more of a historian of science and with no formal philosophical place setting was a self-described amateur philosopher (p. 91). Nevertheless, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions influenced philosophical argument disproportionate to the philosophical discussion contained in the actual book. Regard less, Kuhn still managed to articulate an apparently new and epistemological paradigm, or theory of scientific knowledge (Matthews, 2003, p. 92). More specifically, Kuhns book ...gave a contemporary, scientifically informed, philosophical legitimacy to much older relativist and sceptical traditions in epistemology (Matthews, 2003, p. 92). For example, ancient Protagoreans such as Plato and other realist philosophers argued that what appeared to be just was just. Influenced by Kuhns book, modern Protagoreans would argue that scientific truths and decisions were intratheoretic and a rational conclusion can be drawn by facial expression more closely at conflicting theories (Matthews, 2003, p. 92). Modern Protagoreans, took a more Kuhnian position arguing that different paradigms saw different things and not simply saw the same thing differently ontological learn vs epistemological claim (Matthews, 2003, p. 93). Since this pattern could be observed in science, it can be

No comments:

Post a Comment