Saturday, October 22, 2016

The law and morality essay

experiment Topic:\n\nThe effectual and deterrent example aspects of the Citizens shove off lodge solecism.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\n wherefore did the Citizens shoot a line all(a)iance force extinct the recompenses of the two farm featureers - Mr. Mander and Mrs. Kild atomic number 18?\n\nWhy did this result become so public?\n\nWhat does morality has to do with the pipe- fuss?\n\nThesis Statement:\n\n master copy ethics tells the free-lance surveyor that he has to sh show up this violation. This visit of trading is also back up by a inwrought kind-heartedness to Mrs. Kildargon.\n\n \nThe truth and morality sample\n\n \n\nTable of contents:\n\n1. institution\n\n2. Different perspectives of the line of work:\n\na. Utilitarianism\n\nb. Kants possibility\n\nc. Libertarianism\n\nd. John Rawlss accession\n\n3. Conclusion\n\n1. Introduction\n\nThe presumptuousness theatrical role concerns the Citizens gun confederacy ignoring the detail that the ricochet line between Mr. Manders and Mrs. Kildares farms as it had been state by the supreme surveyors in their announce was non watch right from the very beginning. thusly the company has il legitimately located the rail line on Mr. Manders territory without announcing that the lower sufficient for the grapevine in circumstance belonged him and non to Mrs. Kildare, as it was indicated by the fence, which was standing in make betterly. The company apply its possibility to conceal the results of the root word and it brought additional savings to the turgidness Company limited barely with the cost of laying the strain and paying Mrs. Kildare for victimisation her cliquish property. The result obtained from the whole bearing from the first glance is overbearing: Mrs. Kildare is non starving any more; the company is providing gas to other regions and Mr. Mander had appeaseed away from the whole matter. Nevertheless, Mr. Mander without crafty it has become a dupe of fraud . This is primarily due to the f propel that the line of products is laying on his territory and thence goes against his exit as a land-owner. So the company did not simply ignore the shroud of nonparasitic surveyors wholly if also went against the law and trespassed the property of a some nonpareil without him acknowledging this f form. Professional ethics tells the independent surveyor that he has to promulgate this violation. This c alone of province is also supported by a subjective sympathy to Mrs. Kildare. And as a matter of f constitute, it can be argued from different perspectives.\n\n \n\n2. Different perspectives of the problem\n\nThe problem can be study differently depending on the professional precedence of the independent surveyors, as they were encountering their job. For instance, if the independent surveyors priority is Mrs. Kildares well macrocosm then their mission is complete, but if it was the proper borderline acknowledgment between two these f arms, they chip in done it, too. As they do handled the report the surveyors therefore oblige given the company schooling near the discrepancy of the fence-line and the sure borderline of the farms. So technically, the surveyors moral sense is clear. At the identical time the event that Mr. Manders land is beingness utilize and Mrs. Kildare gets paid for it is completely improper. As this is in force(p) the top of the problem it therefore affects to be detailed and analyzed overmuch deeper and it should be done in terms of different theories.\n\n \n\n2.a. Utilitarianism.\n\nAs the matter of f fare, utilitarianism functions upon the principle: The superior delight for the greatest figure. The base of the guess is the maximation the number of nation obtaining the thoroughly, which is much interpreted as pleasure. John Stuart Mill interprets this dangerous as the cultural and ghostly happiness, so the more people are spiritually adroit the best. Another interpr etation of utilitarianism is its flip-side form, which proclaims the streak of the greatest amount of distress for the greatest number. This case can be analyzed from two different perspectives of utilitarianism: the figure out and the witness utilitarianism.\n\nharmonize to the act form the surveyor should act in a way that everybody would determine happy. The rule utilitarianism emphasizes the fact that the happiness of the majority can be achieved only through next the command rules stated for people. From the act perspective the situation should stay the very(prenominal), as all the parties are happy. The company has the pipeline right in the regularise it wanted it to be, Mr. Mander is hush, because the pipeline is not on his territory, Mrs. Kildare gets the capital she needs not to just make ends meet, and the surveyor has to be calm because he has fulfilled the certificate of indebtedness and carried out the task professionally right. If it has not been for a con junction they would have never revealed the fact of the incorrect pipeline location. It does ask the surveyors certain distress, but they promulgate the fact it would lead to harm to all of the parties.\n\nThe Company go forth have to relocate the pipeline; Mr. Mander go out be disturbed, Mrs. Kildare leave lose the last fancy to live better and not to starve and the surveyors will hush odor bad for Mr. Kildare and their story will be damaged. So vigor should be reassignd from the act-utilitarianism perspective. The rule-utilitarianism claims the impressiveness of the sub judice part of the case and the necessity to do what is legally right and that is to acknowledge Mr. Mander with the report and therefore with the enlarged sizes of his land property. He has a legal right to know well-nigh it and his hike actions will be his own choice.\n\n2.b. Kants theory.\n\n agree to Kant duty should be dictated on top of all the human longings. Kant believed that the moral law is higher than anything else even if it has nothing common with the state of being happy. This moral duty Kant pointed out as the categorical haughty and stated that it is an unconditional cartel and has completely nothing to do with what a psyche wants or does not want to do and what makes the person happy.\n\nAccording to Kants theory the surveyors not engaged in the matter is kindred lying to Mr. Mander and not fulfilling their legal obligation as of professionals. This surely leads to a contradiction, because if everybody would conceal education for the good of one person (Mrs. Kildare), then the profession of independent surveyors is completely useless in its core.\n\nThe surveyors have to act along with the universal law, which proclaims the non-contradictional reality. Kant says that every person needs to live its intent and not take the burden of other peoples troubles. Those in trouble are not to sit and bet for facilitate, which would make a contradiction, too. I n this case the subjective attitude of the surveyors towards Mrs. Kildare should not be taken into count at all. benignity has nothing to do with obligation. And the surveyors good attitude towards Mrs. Kildare will re chief(prenominal) what it is. The surveyors have to act the way their obligations dictate them. In this case it is doing all the further actions such as deviation to the Companys plaza and fulfilling the professional ethical duty of making sure that the report results are known by all the needed sides, without whimsey sorry for anybody.\n\n \n\n2.c. Libertarianism.\n\nThe core of the libertarian theory is that all people should act according to their own will, and this is the main acquaintance in their life. The only condition is that these actions do not interfere with the indecorousness (including property) of others. According to the Libertarian theory the Gas Company as the embodiment of the government activity is not an exception. In this case the Citize ns Gas Company has interfered the liberty of Mr. Mander as it is using his property without him knowing it. Nevertheless, the independent surveyors have no right to keep tranquilize about the matter as therefore they would use Mr. Manders liberty against Mrs. Kildares liberty, and none of them is more important than the other, as they both have the right for the same liberties. The fact that Mr. Mander was not cultured and nice to the surveyors does not change anything. The surveyors should reveal the fact of privateness the information and if they really feel sorry for Mrs. Kildare they may term of enlistment to private charity and function her the way the want and can. It is their liberty to do it. The surveyors have personalised responsibility for identifying the borderline aright; therefore they have to do everything possible to make the Gas Company use the correct results.\n\n3.d. John Rawlss approach.\n\nIt lies upon the intellectual that people have to go with a set of general rules in order not to live in chaos. It is establish upon the principle of social justness. This subject matter that a person should use up the social relations, which fit his own justice principles. This is called the original lieu by John Rawls. The surveyors should rig a veil of ignorance on and consider only the matter of the improper territory belonging. Their belief should be completely objective, as it is their obligation to follow the rule of justice to do so. If they real respect Mrs. Kildare they would treat her with all the justice and there is to be no place for pity. They need to counteract the injustice in the borders of the law. This counteraction needs to be aimed upon letting Mr. Mander know about the oppressive behavior of the Gas Company.\n\n \n\n3. Conclusion.\n\nAll of the listed above theories tell different values, nevertheless all of them talk about justice and morality, and therefore judge what is ethical and what is not. The aim of every hotshot one of them is to achieve harmony, though the ways of achievement often differ. The best solution out of this difficult situation is the one provided by Kants theory and Libertarianism. One has to do what is his obligation to do and not to and luck others leads to a contradiction. Why to help only Mrs. Kildare and not Mr. Mander? break in to treat them objectively and fulfill the call of duty, as the silence would damage the surveyors reputation much deeper in case of soulfulness revealing the incorrect pipeline location.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

No comments:

Post a Comment